Goldstone repents – Israel is not as evil as we all thought

editor Monday 4 April 2011 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share by email Printer friendly

By Andrew Tucker. In an article published in The Washington, Richard Goldstone has acknowledged the shortcomings and inaccuracies of the “fact finding mission” and report which he chaired into the Gaza Cast Lead Post conflict in 2009.

“If I had known then what I know now, the Goldstone Report would have been a different document”, Goldstone wrote.

The Goldstone report issued in 2009 was scathing in its criticizm of Israel’s conduct of the Gaza conflict. The Commission led by the South African jurist Goldstone asserted that the IDF’s military operations “were carefully planned in all their phases as a deliberately disproportionate attack designed to punish, humiliate and terrorize a civilian population.” Israel was portrayed as a militant aggressor, using disproportionate force to kill innocent Palestinian civilians. The Commission recommended that Israel be given three months to launch its own investigations “in conformity with international standards” or face possible referral by the UN Security Council to the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

Now that an independent UN committee has reviewed the case, Goldstone is forced to admit the bias of his Commission’s investigation and findings. Most significantly, Goldstone admits that, while certain Israeli soldiers may have made mistakes, Hamas was the real aggressor. “That the crimes allegedly committed by Hamas were intentional goes without saying — its rockets were purposefully and indiscriminately aimed at civilian targets”. While Israel is conducting detailed investigations into all the allegations of misconduct, Goldstone recognizes that “there has been no effort by Hamas in Gaza to investigate the allegations of its war crimes and possible crimes against humanity”.

Goldstone’s retractions are to be welcomed. Let us hope that the international media gives his retraction as much coverage as it did to the Goldstone report itself. I doubt it.

Perhaps even more importantly, this case shows, in my opinion, just how naive many so-called experts are when it comes to understanding the forces which are at work in the Israeli-Arab conflict. To even have imagined that Hamas would come to its senses and admit wrongdoing, or initiate internal investigations, is to totally miss what is really going on. The fact is that Hamas, and behind them Iran, are hell-bent on destroying Israel and removing the Jewish people from the face of the earth.

This conflict is not about the West Bank. It is not about Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem. It is not about suffering Palestinians. It is about whether or not the Jewish people have the right to live at all as an independent nation in the Middle East. That is the question facing the nations of the world.

The sooner President Obama and his colleagues understand this, the better.

The Washington Post

Reconsidering the Goldstone Report on Israel and war crimes
By Richard Goldstone, Friday, April 1, 8:42 PM

We know a lot more today about what happened in the Gaza war of 2008-09 than we did when I chaired the fact-finding mission appointed by the U.N. Human Rights Council that produced what has come to be known as the Goldstone Report. If I had known then what I know now, the Goldstone Report would have been a different document.

The final report by the U.N. committee of independent experts — chaired by former New York judge Mary McGowan Davis — that followed up on the recommendations of the Goldstone Report has found that “Israel has dedicated significant resources to investigate over 400 allegations of operational misconduct in Gaza” while “the de facto authorities (i.e., Hamas) have not conducted any investigations into the launching of rocket and mortar attacks against Israel.”

Our report found evidence of potential war crimes and “possibly crimes against humanity” by both Israel and Hamas. That the crimes allegedly committed by Hamas were intentional goes without saying — its rockets were purposefully and indiscriminately aimed at civilian targets.

The allegations of intentionality by Israel were based on the deaths of and injuries to civilians in situations where our fact-finding mission had no evidence on which to draw any other reasonable conclusion. While the investigations published by the Israeli military and recognized in the U.N. committee’s report have established the validity of some incidents that we investigated in cases involving individual soldiers, they also indicate that civilians were not intentionally targeted as a matter of policy.

For example, the most serious attack the Goldstone Report focused on was the killing of some 29 members of the al-Simouni family in their home. The shelling of the home was apparently the consequence of an Israeli commander’s erroneous interpretation of a drone image, and an Israeli officer is under investigation for having ordered the attack. While the length of this investigation is frustrating, it appears that an appropriate process is underway, and I am confident that if the officer is found to have been negligent, Israel will respond accordingly. The purpose of these investigations, as I have always said, is to ensure accountability for improper actions, not to second-guess, with the benefit of hindsight, commanders making difficult battlefield decisions.

While I welcome Israel’s investigations into allegations, I share the concerns reflected in the McGowan Davis report that few of Israel’s inquiries have been concluded and believe that the proceedings should have been held in a public forum. Although the Israeli evidence that has emerged since publication of our report doesn’t negate the tragic loss of civilian life, I regret that our fact-finding mission did not have such evidence explaining the circumstances in which we said civilians in Gaza were targeted, because it probably would have influenced our findings about intentionality and war crimes.

Israel’s lack of cooperation with our investigation meant that we were not able to corroborate how many Gazans killed were civilians and how many were combatants. The Israeli military’s numbers have turned out to be similar to those recently furnished by Hamas (although Hamas may have reason to inflate the number of its combatants).

As I indicated from the very beginning, I would have welcomed Israel’s cooperation. The purpose of the Goldstone Report was never to prove a foregone conclusion against Israel. I insisted on changing the original mandate adopted by the Human Rights Council, which was skewed against Israel. I have always been clear that Israel, like any other sovereign nation, has the right and obligation to defend itself and its citizens against attacks from abroad and within. Something that has not been recognized often enough is the fact that our report marked the first time illegal acts of terrorism from Hamas were being investigated and condemned by the United Nations. I had hoped that our inquiry into all aspects of the Gaza conflict would begin a new era of evenhandedness at the U.N. Human Rights Council, whose history of bias against Israel cannot be doubted.

Some have charged that the process we followed did not live up to judicial standards. To be clear: Our mission was in no way a judicial or even quasi-judicial proceeding. We did not investigate criminal conduct on the part of any individual in Israel, Gaza or the West Bank. We made our recommendations based on the record before us, which unfortunately did not include any evidence provided by the Israeli government. Indeed, our main recommendation was for each party to investigate, transparently and in good faith, the incidents referred to in our report. McGowan Davis has found that Israel has done this to a significant degree; Hamas has done nothing.

Some have suggested that it was absurd to expect Hamas, an organization that has a policy to destroy the state of Israel, to investigate what we said were serious war crimes. It was my hope, even if unrealistic, that Hamas would do so, especially if Israel conducted its own investigations. At minimum I hoped that in the face of a clear finding that its members were committing serious war crimes, Hamas would curtail its attacks. Sadly, that has not been the case. Hundreds more rockets and mortar rounds have been directed at civilian targets in southern Israel. That comparatively few Israelis have been killed by the unlawful rocket and mortar attacks from Gaza in no way minimizes the criminality. The U.N. Human Rights Council should condemn these heinous acts in the strongest terms.

In the end, asking Hamas to investigate may have been a mistaken enterprise. So, too, the Human Rights Council should condemn the inexcusable and cold-blooded recent slaughter of a young Israeli couple and three of their small children in their beds.

I continue to believe in the cause of establishing and applying international law to protracted and deadly conflicts. Our report has led to numerous “lessons learned” and policy changes, including the adoption of new Israel Defense Forces procedures for protecting civilians in cases of urban warfare and limiting the use of white phosphorus in civilian areas. The Palestinian Authority established an independent inquiry into our allegations of human rights abuses — assassinations, torture and illegal detentions — perpetrated by Fatah in the West Bank, especially against members of Hamas. Most of those allegations were confirmed by this inquiry. Regrettably, there has been no effort by Hamas in Gaza to investigate the allegations of its war crimes and possible crimes against humanity.

Simply put, the laws of armed conflict apply no less to non-state actors such as Hamas than they do to national armies. Ensuring that non-state actors respect these principles, and are investigated when they fail to do so, is one of the most significant challenges facing the law of armed conflict. Only if all parties to armed conflicts are held to these standards will we be able to protect civilians who, through no choice of their own, are caught up in war.

The writer, a retired justice of the Constitutional Court of South Africa and former chief prosecutor of the U.N. International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, chaired the U.N. fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict.


Tags: , , ,



One Comment to “Goldstone repents – Israel is not as evil as we all thought”

  1. Moya says:

    Most writers or the media always find fault or try to find fault with Israel. What they fail to know and understand is that they are fighting a losing battle. The Bible is full of promises by God to protect His chosen land and people. Time and again, those trying to fight Israel have failed and will do so until the end of time.

    The problem is us, not Israel so we had better be careful or we would find ourselves fighting the Invisible Army of God and God Himself. In Hebrews we are told explicitly not to fall into the Hands of an angry God. If the media is to classify Israel as evil, let us look at what is happening in the Arab countries today… is Israel doing that? No! So how can Goldstone then say that Israel is not as evil as we all thought” How many Israelis have gone downtown Jerusalem and bomb the city or in any country like their neighbouring countries have done? How many terrorists have we heard on the news come from Israel and have bombed America or other countries?

    Everything that i have read and heard is Israel trying to defend itself and how can they not when they are land locked with those who have vowed to wipe Israel off the map of the world. Hitler tried but where is he today? others tried and still, Israel remains. Are these not signs that the God of Israel does not sleep!!!

Leave a Comment

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

Buy now! Israel a journey through time Christians for Israel Donate